Ecrits révisionnistes (1974-1998) BY ROBERT FAURISSON Chapter 25: THE DUTY OF RESISTANCE

Whatever storms and vicissitudes may arise now or in future, the revisionist historian must hold firm. To the cult of tribal remembrance built on fear, vengeance, and greed, he will prefer the stubborn search for exactitude. In this manner he will, albeit perhaps unwittingly, do justice to the true sufferings of all victims of the second world war. And, from this viewpoint, it is he who will refuse to make any distinction between them on the basis of race, religion, or community. Above all else, he will reject the supreme imposture which gave the crowning touch to that conflict: that of the Nuremberg and Tokyo trials, and of the thousand other proceedings since the war in which, still today, the victor, without in the least having to answer for his own crimes, has assumed the right to prosecute and condemn the vanquished.

Contrary to the romantic vision of the aristocratic author François René de Châteaubriand (1768-1848), the historian is hardly commissioned to avenge peoples, and still less so to avenge one which claims to be Gods own.

On whatever subject, the historian in general and the revisionist historian in particular have no other job than to determine the accuracy of what is said. That job is basic and obvious, but also as experience teaches perilous.

3 December 1998

How the political correct holocaust-society argues against revisionistic-scientific findings